šļø Technical Architecture
š¬ Core Technology Stack
Signal Processing Foundation
š Preprocessing Pipeline:
- ⢠Audio normalization: Standardizes volume levels
- ⢠Noise reduction: Wiener filtering for background noise
- ⢠Windowing: Hamming window, 25ms frames
- ⢠FFT analysis: Frequency domain transformation
- ⢠Spectral enhancement: Improves signal clarity
š§ AI Model Architecture:
- ⢠LSTM networks: 3-layer bidirectional LSTM
- ⢠Attention mechanism: Focus on speaker-specific features
- ⢠Permutation invariant training: Handles speaker order
- ⢠Multi-scale processing: Different time resolutions
- ⢠Residual connections: Improved gradient flow
Separation Algorithms
š Blind Source Separation (BSS):
- ⢠Independent Component Analysis (ICA): Statistical independence
- ⢠Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF): Spectral decomposition
- ⢠Permutation solving: Consistent speaker assignment
- ⢠Frequency bin processing: Per-frequency separation
- ⢠Mask estimation: Time-frequency masking
šÆ Deep Learning Models:
- ⢠TasNet architecture: Time-domain audio separation
- ⢠Conv-TasNet: Convolutional encoder-decoder
- ⢠Dual-Path RNN: Local and global modeling
- ⢠Speaker embeddings: Voice characteristic vectors
- ⢠Multi-task learning: Joint separation and recognition
āļø Processing Pipeline
š Step-by-Step Process
Stage 1: Audio Analysis
š¤ Input Processing:
- Audio ingestion: Receives mixed audio signal (mono/stereo)
- Quality assessment: Analyzes SNR, dynamic range, distortion
- Sampling rate normalization: Converts to 16kHz standard
- Pre-emphasis filtering: Balances frequency spectrum
- VAD application: Identifies speech vs non-speech regions
Stage 2: Feature Extraction
š Spectral Features:
- ⢠STFT computation: Short-time Fourier transform
- ⢠Mel-scale analysis: Perceptually relevant frequencies
- ⢠Cepstral coefficients: MFCC for voice characteristics
- ⢠Spectral centroids: Frequency distribution centers
- ⢠Harmonic analysis: Fundamental frequency tracking
ā” Temporal Features:
- ⢠Energy contours: Volume patterns over time
- ⢠Zero-crossing rate: Speech rhythm indicators
- ⢠Pitch tracking: F0 contour extraction
- ⢠Formant analysis: Vocal tract resonances
Stage 3: Separation Processing
šÆ Model Inference:
- ⢠Neural network forward pass: TasNet/Conv-TasNet
- ⢠Mask generation: Time-frequency masks per speaker
- ⢠Permutation resolution: Consistent speaker ordering
- ⢠Post-processing: Artifact removal, smoothing
š§ Signal Reconstruction:
- ⢠Mask application: Element-wise multiplication
- ⢠ISTFT synthesis: Time-domain reconstruction
- ⢠Overlap-add: Frame reconstruction
- ⢠Final normalization: Output level adjustment
š Performance Analysis
šÆ Separation Quality Metrics
Standard Evaluation Metrics
š Audio Quality Measures:
- ⢠SDR (Signal-to-Distortion Ratio): 8.3 dB average
- ⢠SIR (Signal-to-Interference Ratio): 12.1 dB average
- ⢠SAR (Signal-to-Artifact Ratio): 9.7 dB average
- ⢠PESQ score: 2.8/4.0 (perceptual quality)
- ⢠STOI score: 0.76 (intelligibility)
ā” Processing Performance:
- ⢠Real-time factor: 1.2x (120% real-time speed)
- ⢠Latency: 250ms end-to-end
- ⢠Memory usage: 512MB peak
- ⢠CPU utilization: 40-60% single core
- ⢠Accuracy degradation: 15% in noisy environments
Speaker Count Performance
| Speakers | SDR (dB) | Separation Accuracy | Processing Speed | Memory Usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 11.2 dB | 84.3% | 0.9x RT | 340MB |
| 3 | 9.8 dB | 76.9% | 1.1x RT | 445MB |
| 4 | 7.6 dB | 68.2% | 1.3x RT | 580MB |
| 5+ | 5.1 dB | 52.7% | 1.8x RT | 720MB |
š Real-World Applications
šÆ Use Case Scenarios
Optimal Scenarios
ā High Performance Conditions:
- ⢠Interview recordings: 1-on-1, controlled environment
- ⢠Small meetings: 2-4 participants, clear audio
- ⢠Podcast post-production: Clean studio recordings
- ⢠Conference calls: Individual headsets/mics
- ⢠Training sessions: Instructor + few students
š Expected Results:
- ⢠Separation quality: 80-90% accuracy
- ⢠Transcription improvement: 25-40% better accuracy
- ⢠Speaker labeling: 90%+ correct attribution
- ⢠Processing time: Near real-time
Challenging Scenarios
ā ļø Difficult Conditions:
- ⢠Large group meetings: 6+ speakers, overlapping speech
- ⢠Conference room recordings: Single microphone, echo
- ⢠Noisy environments: Background music, traffic
- ⢠Similar voices: Same gender/age participants
- ⢠Phone conferences: Compressed audio, poor quality
š Performance Impact:
- ⢠Separation quality: 50-65% accuracy
- ⢠Processing time: 1.5-2x real-time
- ⢠Artifacts: Increased musical noise
- ⢠Speaker confusion: 30-40% mislabeling
ā ļø Technical Limitations
š« System Constraints
Fundamental Limitations
š Mathematical Constraints:
- ⢠Underdetermined problem: More speakers than channels
- ⢠Permutation ambiguity: Speaker order inconsistency
- ⢠Frequency aliasing: High-frequency artifacts
- ⢠Non-stationary signals: Changing voice characteristics
- ⢠Cocktail party problem: Fundamental complexity
š» Technical Constraints:
- ⢠Computational complexity: O(n²) with speaker count
- ⢠Memory requirements: Scales with audio length
- ⢠Model size: 50MB+ neural network models
- ⢠Training data bias: English-centric optimization
Practical Limitations
š¤ Audio Quality Dependencies:
- ⢠SNR threshold: Requires >10dB signal-to-noise ratio
- ⢠Sampling rate: Minimum 16kHz for good results
- ⢠Dynamic range: 16-bit minimum, 24-bit preferred
- ⢠Frequency response: Full-range audio preferred
ā±ļø Real-Time Constraints:
- ⢠Latency accumulation: 250ms+ processing delay
- ⢠Buffer requirements: 1-2 second look-ahead needed
- ⢠CPU limitations: Single-threaded bottlenecks
- ⢠Memory pressure: Large model inference costs
āļø Technology Comparison
š Industry Comparison
| Platform | Technology | SDR Score | Max Speakers | Real-Time Factor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notta | Conv-TasNet + LSTM | 8.3 dB | 8 speakers | 1.2x |
| Fireflies | Transformer-based | 9.1 dB | 10 speakers | 0.8x |
| Otter.ai | Proprietary CNN | 7.9 dB | 10 speakers | 1.0x |
| Sembly | Hybrid BSS + DNN | 8.7 dB | 6 speakers | 1.4x |
| Supernormal | Basic clustering | 6.2 dB | 5 speakers | 0.7x |
š Related Technical Topics
Need Advanced Audio Separation? š¬
Compare speaker separation technologies across all meeting AI platforms to find the most sophisticated solution.