๐งช Testing Methodology
๐ Test Scenarios
We conducted comprehensive testing across multiple scenarios to evaluate Notta's speaker identification performance in real-world conditions.
๐ฏ Scenario Types:
- 2-person interviews: Clear speaker separation
- 5-person meetings: Multiple voice overlap testing
- 10-person conference: Maximum capacity stress test
- Accented speech: International speaker diversity
- Background noise: Real office environment simulation
๐ Audio Conditions:
- Studio quality: Professional microphones
- Laptop built-in: Standard video call audio
- Phone recording: Mobile device capture
- Conference room: Shared microphone setup
- Noisy environment: Coffee shop/open office
๐ Accuracy Measurement
Correct Identification
85%
Speakers correctly identified and labeled consistently
False Positives
8%
New speakers created for existing voices
Missed Detection
7%
Voice changes not recognized as new speakers
๐ Performance Analysis
๐ Strengths
โ Consistent Performance:
- Stable accuracy: 85% maintained across different sessions
- Good 2-3 speaker handling: 92% accuracy with small groups
- Clear audio optimization: 90%+ with high-quality input
- Fast processing: Real-time results with minimal delay
- Multilingual support: 104 languages with decent accuracy
๐ฏ Use Case Excellence:
- Client interviews: Perfect for 1:1 or small group calls
- Podcast recording: Reliable host/guest separation
- Training sessions: Instructor/participant distinction
- International calls: Handles accent variations well
- Budget-friendly: Good value for the feature set
โ ๏ธ Limitations
โ Technical Constraints:
- 10 speaker limit: Large meetings exceed capacity
- Background noise sensitivity: 65% accuracy in noisy environments
- Similar voice confusion: Family members or similar tones
- Cross-talk issues: Overlapping speech causes errors
- No custom training: Cannot improve with usage data
๐ง Feature Gaps:
- Generic labeling: 'Speaker 1, 2, 3' vs. custom names
- No emotion detection: Missing sentiment analysis
- Limited analytics: Basic talk time metrics only
- No speaker profiles: Cannot remember voices across sessions
- Manual corrections: Time-consuming label editing
๐ฌ Real-World Test Results
๐ Test Case 1: Client Sales Call (2 Speakers)
Setup
- โข 45-minute sales demo
- โข Zoom call recording
- โข Clear audio quality
- โข Minimal background noise
Results
- โข 92% accuracy
- โข 2 false speaker splits
- โข Clean separation
- โข 1.5 sec processing delay
Verdict
Perfect for sales calls and client interactions
๐ฅ Test Case 2: Team Meeting (6 Speakers)
Setup
- โข 30-minute standup
- โข Conference room mic
- โข Mixed audio quality
- โข Some cross-talk
Results
- โข 78% accuracy
- โข 3 extra speaker labels
- โข Some voice merging
- โข 3 sec processing delay
Verdict
Workable but requires manual cleanup
๐ช Test Case 3: Large Conference (10 Speakers)
Setup
- โข 60-minute all-hands
- โข Multiple microphones
- โข Variable audio quality
- โข Frequent interruptions
Results
- โข 62% accuracy
- โข Hit 10 speaker limit
- โข Significant confusion
- โข 5+ sec processing delays
Verdict
Not suitable for large group meetings
๐ Competitive Comparison
| Feature | Notta | Otter.ai | Fireflies | Rev.ai |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy Rate | 85% | 83% | 88% | 92% |
| Max Speakers | 10 | 10 | 20 | 25 |
| Languages | 104 | English only | 69 | 36 |
| Real-time Processing | 2-5 sec delay | 1-3 sec | 3-7 sec | Near real-time |
| Custom Names | Manual only | AI + Manual | AI + Manual | Full AI |
| Pricing (Pro) | $8.25/month | $10/month | $10/month | $0.025/min |
๐ Competitive Analysis:
๐ฏ Notta's Advantages:
- โข Best multilingual support (104 languages)
- โข Competitive pricing at $8.25/month
- โข Solid 85% accuracy for most use cases
- โข Good performance with clear audio
โ ๏ธ Areas for Improvement:
- โข Lower accuracy than Rev.ai and Fireflies
- โข Limited to 10 speakers vs competitors
- โข Slower real-time processing
- โข Basic speaker labeling features
๐ฏ Use Case Recommendations
โ Perfect For
- ๐ฃ๏ธ Client calls: 1:1 or small group meetings
- ๐๏ธ Podcast recording: Host/guest conversations
- ๐ Interviews: Job interviews or research
- ๐ International calls: Multiple languages needed
- ๐ฐ Budget projects: Good value for money
- ๐ Training sessions: Clear instructor/student separation
โ ๏ธ Use With Caution
- ๐ฅ Medium meetings: 4-8 people (manual cleanup needed)
- ๐ Noisy environments: Reduced accuracy expected
- ๐ค Poor audio quality: Built-in mics may struggle
- ๐ฌ Cross-talk heavy: Frequent interruptions
- ๐จโ๐ฉโ๐งโ๐ฆ Similar voices: Family members or twins
- ๐ Analytics needs: Limited speaker insights
โ Not Recommended
- ๐ข Large meetings: 10+ participants
- ๐ Conference calls: Multiple dial-ins
- ๐ช Events/webinars: Audience Q&A sessions
- โ๏ธ Legal proceedings: High accuracy requirements
- ๐ฅ Medical dictation: Critical documentation
- ๐ Advanced analytics: Detailed speaker insights needed
๐ Final Verdict
Overall Score: 7.5/10
Notta offers solid speaker identification performance that excels in small group settings and multilingual environments. While it doesn't lead the market in accuracy, its 85% performance rate and 104-language support make it a compelling choice for international teams on a budget.
๐ก Bottom Line
โ Choose Notta If:
- โข You need multilingual support
- โข Budget is a primary concern
- โข Most meetings have โค5 participants
- โข Audio quality is generally good
โ Skip If:
- โข You need 95%+ accuracy
- โข Large meetings are common
- โข Advanced analytics required
- โข English-only environment