📊 Overall G2 Performance Metrics
🏆 Key Performance Indicators
Rating Breakdown & Statistics
⭐ Overall Rating Metrics:
- • Overall rating: 4.2/5.0 stars (156 total reviews)
- • Ease of use: 4.4/5.0 (highly intuitive interface)
- • Quality of support: 3.8/5.0 (room for improvement)
- • Ease of setup: 4.6/5.0 (excellent onboarding)
- • Ease of admin: 4.3/5.0 (strong management capabilities)
- • Quality of features: 4.1/5.0 (solid functionality)
📈 Market Position & Trends:
- • G2 category ranking: #7 in AI Meeting Assistant
- • User satisfaction: 89% would recommend
- • Review velocity: +42% increase in 2025
- • Market presence: "High Performer" badge
- • Competitive position: Strong mid-tier performer
- • Growth trajectory: Steady upward trend in reviews
Review Distribution & User Demographics
⭐ Star Rating Distribution:
- • 5 stars: 47% (73 reviews) - Highly satisfied users
- • 4 stars: 32% (50 reviews) - Generally positive
- • 3 stars: 14% (22 reviews) - Mixed experience
- • 2 stars: 5% (8 reviews) - Below expectations
- • 1 star: 2% (3 reviews) - Very dissatisfied
- • Average trend: Slight improvement over 6 months
👥 User Demographics:
- • Company size: 65% small business (1-50 employees)
- • Mid-market: 28% medium business (51-1000 employees)
- • Enterprise: 7% large enterprise (1000+ employees)
- • Industries: 40% tech, 25% consulting, 20% finance, 15% other
- • User roles: 45% managers, 35% individual contributors, 20% executives
- • Geographic spread: 70% North America, 20% Europe, 10% other
✅ Positive User Feedback & Strengths
🌟 Most Praised Features
Interface & User Experience Highlights
🎨 Design & Usability:
- • "Intuitive and clean interface" - Most common praise (78% mention)
- • "Easy setup and onboarding" - Consistently highlighted
- • "Beautiful, modern design" - Visual appeal appreciated
- • "Mac-native feel" - Excellent macOS integration
- • "Simple but powerful" - Balance of simplicity and functionality
- • "Fast and responsive" - Performance satisfaction
🚀 Standout Capabilities:
- • "Real-time collaboration is game-changing" - Unique differentiator
- • "Great for brainstorming sessions" - Creative meeting support
- • "Automatic action item detection" - AI functionality
- • "Excellent meeting preparation features" - Pre-meeting workflow
- • "Smart meeting insights" - AI-powered analysis
- • "Seamless screen sharing integration" - Technical reliability
Specific User Testimonials
"Supernormal transformed how our small team runs meetings. The real-time collaboration during calls is incredible - we can all contribute to notes simultaneously without chaos."
- Sarah M., Product Manager at 15-person startup (5/5 stars)
"As a Mac user, I appreciate how native Supernormal feels. It's fast, beautiful, and just works. The automatic action items save me 20 minutes after every meeting."
- James L., Consultant (5/5 stars)
"Setup was incredibly easy - literally 2 minutes and we were recording our first meeting. The interface is so intuitive that our team adopted it instantly."
- Maria R., Operations Director (4/5 stars)
⚠️ Critical Feedback & User Concerns
🔍 Most Common Complaints
Feature Limitations & Integration Issues
🔌 Integration Shortcomings:
- • "Limited CRM integrations" - 43% of negative reviews mention
- • "No Salesforce connection" - Major enterprise concern
- • "Zapier automation is basic" - Workflow limitations
- • "Missing Slack bot features" - Team communication gaps
- • "Calendar sync issues" - Scheduling reliability problems
- • "API limitations for custom builds" - Developer frustrations
📉 Transcription Accuracy Concerns:
- • "Inconsistent accuracy with accents" - International teams struggle
- • "Poor performance in noisy environments" - Audio quality dependency
- • "Speaker identification confusion" - Multi-speaker meetings
- • "Technical term recognition issues" - Industry-specific vocabulary
- • "Requires significant editing" - Post-meeting cleanup needed
- • "No custom vocabulary training" - Personalization limits
Pricing & Support Issues
💰 Cost-Related Concerns:
- • "Pricing not transparent" - 31% mention unclear costs
- • "Expensive for small teams" - Budget constraints for startups
- • "No clear ROI calculation" - Value proposition unclear
- • "Hidden costs for integrations" - Unexpected expenses
- • "Free tier too limited" - Trial restrictions
- • "Annual commitment required" - Flexibility concerns
🆘 Support Experience Issues:
- • "Slow response times" - 2-3 day delays reported
- • "No phone support available" - Communication limitations
- • "Documentation gaps" - Learning resource concerns
- • "Limited training resources" - Onboarding challenges
- • "Feature requests ignored" - User feedback concerns
- • "No dedicated account manager" - Relationship building issues
Critical User Testimonials
"Great interface, but the lack of Salesforce integration is a dealbreaker for our sales team. We need our meeting notes in our CRM automatically."
- David K., Sales Director (2/5 stars)
"Transcription accuracy varies wildly. Sometimes perfect, sometimes unusable. For the price we pay, consistency should be guaranteed."
- Amanda T., Project Manager (3/5 stars)
"Support took 4 days to respond to a critical issue. When they did reply, the solution was buried in documentation I couldn't find."
- Robert H., IT Manager (2/5 stars)
🏆 G2 Competitive Positioning
📊 Market Position vs Competitors
G2 Rankings Comparison
🥇 Higher-Rated Competitors:
- • Fireflies.ai: 4.5/5.0 (892 reviews) - Market leader
- • Otter.ai: 4.1/5.0 (2,847 reviews) - Brand recognition
- • Gong: 4.7/5.0 (1,234 reviews) - Enterprise favorite
- • Chorus: 4.4/5.0 (456 reviews) - Sales-focused
- • Rev: 4.3/5.0 (234 reviews) - Transcription specialist
- • Avoma: 4.6/5.0 (189 reviews) - Revenue intelligence
📈 Supernormal's Competitive Advantages:
- • Real-time collaboration: Unique differentiator vs competitors
- • Mac optimization: Best-in-class macOS experience
- • Setup simplicity: Fastest time-to-value (4.6/5.0)
- • Interface design: Highest ease of use rating
- • Growth momentum: +42% review increase in 2025
- • Price point: Competitive mid-tier positioning
Category Performance Analysis
🎯 Strength Categories:
- • Ease of Setup: #2 in category (4.6/5.0)
- • Ease of Use: #3 in category (4.4/5.0)
- • Product Direction: #5 in category (4.2/5.0)
- • Meets Requirements: #6 in category (4.1/5.0)
- • Value for Money: #8 in category (3.9/5.0)
- • Overall Satisfaction: #7 in category (4.2/5.0)
⚠️ Improvement Areas:
- • Quality of Support: #12 in category (3.8/5.0)
- • Business Partnership: #11 in category (3.9/5.0)
- • Implementation: #9 in category (4.0/5.0)
- • Admin Experience: #8 in category (4.1/5.0)
- • Integration Capability: #13 in category (3.7/5.0)
- • Advanced Features: #10 in category (3.8/5.0)
💡 Purchase Decision Insights
🎯 Decision Factors from Reviews
When Supernormal Works Best
✅ Ideal Use Cases:
- • Small to medium teams: 5-50 person organizations
- • Mac-centric environments: Organizations with Apple ecosystem
- • Creative collaboration: Brainstorming and ideation sessions
- • Real-time note-taking: Teams needing collaborative documentation
- • Simple workflows: Organizations preferring minimalist tools
- • Quick deployment: Teams needing immediate implementation
❌ Poor Fit Scenarios:
- • Heavy CRM users: Sales teams requiring Salesforce integration
- • Large enterprises: Organizations needing enterprise-grade support
- • Complex workflows: Teams requiring extensive automation
- • International teams: Multi-language or accent diversity
- • Technical industries: Specialized vocabulary requirements
- • Budget-sensitive: Organizations needing transparent pricing
Review-Based Recommendations
🌟 Choose Supernormal If:
- • You value real-time collaborative note-taking above all
- • Your team primarily uses Mac computers
- • Simple, beautiful interfaces are priority
- • You need quick setup and immediate productivity
- • Your meetings are primarily brainstorming or creative
- • You can work with basic integration options
🔄 Consider Alternatives If:
- • You need extensive CRM integrations (try Gong)
- • Transcription accuracy is critical (try Fireflies.ai)
- • You require 24/7 support (try Otter.ai)
- • Budget transparency is important (try Sembly)
- • You need advanced automation (try Zapier + Otter)
- • Your team is large/enterprise (try Avoma)
🔗 Related Review Resources
🥊 Supernormal vs Fireflies
Head-to-head comparison of G2's top-rated alternatives
💰 Supernormal Pricing
Complete pricing analysis addressing G2 transparency concerns
📊 G2 Rankings Comparison
Complete G2 rankings for all AI meeting assistants
🔄 Supernormal Alternatives
Top-rated alternatives based on G2 performance
Ready to Find Your Top-Rated Tool? 🚀
Compare Supernormal with the highest-rated AI meeting assistants and find the perfect fit for your team's needs.