
π Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | π Notta | 𦦠Otter.ai | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly Price (Pro Plan) | $8.17 (annual) | $8.33 (annual) | π Notta (slight edge) |
| Languages Supported | 58 languages | 3 languages (EN, ES, FR) | π Notta |
| Transcription Accuracy | Up to 98.86% | 85-95% | π Notta |
| Real-Time Transcription | Limited | Excellent | 𦦠Otter.ai |
| Translation Features | 58 languages | None | π Notta |
| Collaboration Features | Basic sharing | Advanced team features | 𦦠Otter.ai |
| Free Plan | 120 min total (3min per file) | 300 min/month | 𦦠Otter.ai |
| Processing Speed | 5 min for 1 hour audio | Real-time | Context dependent |
π Detailed Feature Analysis
π― Transcription Accuracy
π Notta:
- β’ Claims up to 98.86% accuracy
- β’ Processes 1 hour in 5 minutes
- β’ Strong with technical jargon
- β’ Handles multiple speakers well
- β’ Better in noisy environments
𦦠Otter.ai:
- β’ Around 85-90% accuracy in practice
- β’ Real-time processing
- β’ Struggles with accents
- β’ Speaker identification issues
- β’ Requires high-quality audio
π Language Support
π Notta:
- β’ 58 languages supported
- β’ Real-time translation (42 languages)
- β’ Bilingual meeting handling
- β’ Mixed-language conversations
- β’ Strong Asian language support
𦦠Otter.ai:
- β’ Only 3 languages (EN, ES, FR)
- β’ Primarily English-focused
- β’ No real-time translation
- β’ Limited Spanish/French accuracy
- β’ US market focus
π€ Collaboration & Integration
π Notta:
- β’ Basic sharing via links
- β’ Export to multiple formats
- β’ Zoom, Teams, Google Meet
- β’ Screen recording capability
- β’ AI chatbot for Q&A
𦦠Otter.ai:
- β’ Real-time collaboration
- β’ Team channels and commenting
- β’ Advanced editing features
- β’ Highlight and bookmark tools
- β’ Strong CRM integrations
π° Pricing & Value Analysis
Notta Pricing
Free Plan
120 minutes total (3min per recording)
β οΈ Limited utility
Pro Plan
$8.17/month
1,800 minutes, translation, exports
β Best value for heavy users
Business Plan
$16.67/month
Unlimited minutes, team features
Otter.ai Pricing
Basic Plan (Free)
300 minutes/month, 30min per recording
β Generous free tier
Pro Plan
$8.33/month
1,200 minutes, advanced features
π‘ Good for regular users
Business Plan
$20/month
6,000 minutes, team management
π‘ Value Assessment:
Nottaoffers better value for high-volume users with unlimited business plans and multilingual needs.Otter.aiprovides more accessible entry with its generous free tier and competitive pro pricing.
π― Which Tool For Your Team?
Choose Notta If:
- βGlobal team- You need support for 58+ languages
- βHigh accuracy priority- 98.86% vs 85-90%
- βTranslation needed- Real-time translation features
- βPost-meeting focus- You don't need real-time transcription
- βTechnical discussions- Better with jargon and noise
Choose Otter.ai If:
- βEnglish-only team- Superior English transcription quality
- βReal-time needed- Live transcription during meetings
- βTeam collaboration- Multiple people editing notes
- βFree tier user- 300 minutes monthly is generous
- βProven reliability- 8+ years track record
β User Reviews Summary
π Notta User Feedback
π What Users Love:
- β’ Exceptional multilingual accuracy
- β’ Fast processing speeds
- β’ Affordable pricing for features offered
- β’ Translation capabilities
- β’ Strong technical terminology handling
π Common Complaints:
- β’ Limited free plan (only 3 minutes)
- β’ No true real-time transcription
- β’ Basic collaboration features
- β’ Newer player in market
𦦠Otter.ai User Feedback
π What Users Love:
- β’ Real-time transcription during meetings
- β’ Strong collaboration features
- β’ Generous free tier (300 min/month)
- β’ Established market presence
- β’ Good integration ecosystem
π Common Complaints:
- β’ Lower transcription accuracy (~85%)
- β’ Speaker identification problems
- β’ Struggles with accents
- β’ Billing and customer service issues
- β’ English-only limitation
Review Platform Ratings: Otter.ai averages 4.1-4.4/5 across G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius. Notta is newer but receiving positive feedback for accuracy and multilingual capabilities.
π Final Verdict
Clear winners in different categories:
π Notta Wins For:
- β’ Transcription accuracy (98.86% vs 85-90%)
- β’ Multilingual support (58 vs 3 languages)
- β’ Translation features
- β’ Technical terminology handling
- β’ Processing speed (5 min for 1 hour)
- β’ Value for money
𦦠Otter.ai Wins For:
- β’ Real-time transcription
- β’ Team collaboration features
- β’ Free plan generosity (300 min/month)
- β’ Market maturity & reliability
- β’ Integration ecosystem
- β’ User interface design
π‘ Our recommendation:Choose based on your primary needs -Notta for accuracy & multilingual,Otter.ai for real-time & collaboration!
π Related Comparisons
Ready to Choose? π
Still unsure which tool is right for your team? Take our personalized quiz to get a recommendation based on your specific needs, team size, and budget.