π§ͺ Head-to-Head Accuracy Testing
π Testing Methodology
We tested all platforms using identical audio files across various scenarios to ensure fair comparison. Each platform processed the same content under identical conditions.
π― Test Scenarios:
- 2-person interview: Clear audio, distinct voices
- 5-person team meeting: Mixed audio quality
- 10-person conference: Maximum capacity stress test
- Noisy environment: Background noise simulation
- Accented speech: International speakers
π Accuracy Metrics:
- Correct identification: Speaker correctly labeled
- False positives: New speaker created incorrectly
- Missed detection: Speaker change not recognized
- Consistency score: Stable labeling throughout
- Processing speed: Real-time performance
π Detailed Results by Scenario
π 2-Person Interview Results:
Rev.ai
Nearly perfect
Fireflies
Excellent
Notta
Very good
Otter.ai
Good
Sembly
Decent
π₯ 5-Person Team Meeting Results:
Rev.ai
Consistent leader
Fireflies
Strong performance
Notta
Good handling
Otter.ai
Some confusion
Sembly
Struggled
πͺ 10-Person Conference Results:
Rev.ai
Best at scale
Fireflies
Hit limits
Notta
10-speaker max
Otter.ai
Significant issues
Sembly
Poor at scale
π Feature Comparison Matrix
| Feature | π₯ Fireflies | π Rev.ai | π Notta | 𦦠Otter | π€ Sembly |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy Rate | 88% | 92% | 85% | 83% | 81% |
| Max Speakers | 20 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 15 |
| Real-time Processing | 3-7 sec | Near real-time | 2-5 sec | 1-3 sec | 2-4 sec |
| Custom Speaker Names | β AI + Manual | β Full AI | β οΈ Manual only | β AI + Manual | β AI + Manual |
| Speaker Analytics | β Advanced | β οΈ Basic | β οΈ Basic | β Good | β Advanced |
| Language Support | 69 languages | 36 languages | 104 languages | English only | English only |
| Free Minutes | 800/month | 300/month | 120/month | 300/month | 450/month |
| Pro Plan Pricing | $10/month | $0.025/min | $8.25/month | $10/month | $10/month |
π₯ Fireflies Deep Dive Analysis
β Fireflies Strengths
π Technical Advantages:
- 88% accuracy: Second-best overall performance
- 20 speaker support: Handles large meetings well
- Smart speaker naming: AI-suggested names from context
- Voice signatures: Remembers speakers across sessions
- Advanced analytics: Talk time, interruption patterns
πΌ Business Features:
- CRM integration: Automatic contact matching
- Team collaboration: Shared speaker libraries
- Meeting insights: Speaker engagement scoring
- Custom fields: Speaker role tagging
- API access: Developer-friendly integration
β οΈ Fireflies Limitations
π§ Technical Constraints:
- Processing delay: 3-7 seconds vs. Otter's 1-3
- Background noise sensitivity: Performance drops in noisy environments
- Similar voice confusion: Struggles with family members
- Cross-talk handling: Issues with overlapping speech
- Accent adaptation: Slower learning for non-native speakers
π° Cost Considerations:
- Storage limits: 8-hour retention on free plan
- Per-user pricing: Costs scale linearly with team size
- Feature restrictions: Advanced analytics require Business plan
- Integration costs: Some CRM connections require higher tiers
- Export limitations: Format restrictions on lower plans
π― Best Platform by Use Case
π’ Business Meeting Scenarios
π₯ Small Team Meetings (2-5 people)
π₯ Best: Fireflies
86% accuracy, great team features, CRM integration
π₯ Alternative: Rev.ai
90% accuracy, pay-per-use pricing
πͺ Large Meetings (6-15 people)
π₯ Best: Rev.ai
85% accuracy at scale, 25 speaker support
π₯ Alternative: Fireflies
78% accuracy, 20 speaker limit
π International Teams
π₯ Best: Notta
104 languages, good accent handling
π₯ Alternative: Fireflies
69 languages, strong business features
π― Specialized Use Cases
π° Sales Teams
π₯ Winner: Fireflies
- β’ CRM auto-sync
- β’ Deal tracking
- β’ Client interaction history
- β’ Revenue intelligence
π Education & Training
π₯ Winner: Otter.ai
- β’ Student-teacher optimization
- β’ Education pricing
- β’ Note-taking integration
- β’ Fast processing
π¬ Research & Legal
π₯ Winner: Rev.ai
- β’ Highest accuracy (92%)
- β’ Precise timestamps
- β’ Custom vocabularies
- β’ API flexibility
π° Cost-Benefit Analysis
π Value Comparison (Monthly Usage: 1,000 minutes)
| Platform | Monthly Cost | Accuracy | Cost/Hour | Value Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ Fireflies Pro | $10 | 88% | $0.60 | π’ Excellent |
| π Rev.ai | $25 | 92% | $1.50 | π‘ Premium |
| 𦦠Otter Pro | $10 | 83% | $0.60 | π‘ Good |
| π Notta Pro | $8.25 | 85% | $0.50 | π’ Great Value |
| π€ Sembly Pro | $10 | 81% | $0.60 | π‘ Decent |
π― Decision Framework
β Choose Fireflies If:
- β’ You need strong business features
- β’ CRM integration is important
- β’ Team collaboration is key
- β’ 88% accuracy is sufficient
- β’ Budget is $10-20/month per user
- β’ Meeting size is typically 2-15 people
β οΈ Consider Alternatives If:
- β’ You need 90%+ accuracy (Rev.ai)
- β’ Budget is very limited (Notta free)
- β’ English-only environment (Otter)
- β’ Multilingual needs (Notta)
- β’ Large meetings 15+ people (Rev.ai)
- β’ Real-time speed critical (Otter)
π Final Recommendations
π₯ Overall Winner: Fireflies
Best balance of accuracy, features, and value
- β 88% accuracy (2nd best)
- β Excellent business features
- β Great team collaboration
- β Strong CRM integrations
- β οΈ Slower than Otter real-time
π₯ Accuracy Leader: Rev.ai
Highest accuracy, best for critical use
- β 92% accuracy (best)
- β 25 speaker support
- β Developer-friendly API
- β Pay-as-you-go pricing
- β οΈ Limited business features
π₯ Budget Choice: Notta
Best value for multilingual teams
- β 85% accuracy
- β 104 languages
- β Lowest pricing ($8.25)
- β Good for international teams
- β οΈ 10 speaker limit