ποΈ Federal Law Baseline
The federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) establishes a baseline one-party consent rule across the United States. Under federal law, recording a conversation is legal if at least one participant consents to the recording - and that participant can be you.
However, states can implement stricter requirements than federal law, and many do. When state law conflicts with federal law on recording consent, the stricter standard applies. This is why understanding your state laws (and your participants state laws) is essential.
π€ One-Party vs Two-Party Consent
β One-Party Consent States
In these states, only one person in the conversation needs to agree to the recording. If you are participating in the meeting, you can record without informing others.
β οΈ Two-Party (All-Party) Consent States
In these states, all participants must consent before recording begins. Recording without unanimous consent is illegal and can result in criminal charges or civil liability.
πΊοΈ State-by-State Recording Laws
β One-Party Consent States (38 + DC)
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming
π¨ Two-Party Consent States (12)
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Washington
Note: Note: Some states like Connecticut, Oregon, and Michigan have nuanced rules depending on whether conversations are electronic or in-person.
π Cross-State Recording Considerations
Video meetings often involve participants from multiple states with different consent laws. When recording across state lines, courts typically apply the law of the state where the person being recorded is located.
Best Practice: Best Practice: When recording a call or meeting with parties in multiple states, always comply with the strictest laws that apply. If anyone is in a two-party consent state, get consent from all participants.
Example: Example: If you are in New York (one-party consent) and speaking with a client in California (two-party consent), you must get consent from all parties before recording.
πΉ Video Meeting Recording Rules
Video meetings follow the same consent rules as phone calls. Since video recordings capture both audio and visual content, notification requirements apply equally. Most modern AI meeting tools like Otter.ai, Fireflies, and Fathom automatically display recording notifications to help meet disclosure requirements.
Platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet display automatic recording alerts when recording begins. However, relying solely on platform notifications may not satisfy legal requirements in all states - verbal or written consent is recommended for two-party consent jurisdictions.
π Types of Consent
Active Consent
The participant explicitly agrees through verbal confirmation, written acknowledgment, or clicking an accept button.
Passive Consent
The participant is informed about recording and does not object. Staying in the meeting after notification may constitute passive consent in some jurisdictions.
π‘ Tip: Tip: For maximum legal protection, always obtain active consent in writing or on the recording itself before proceeding.
π’ Workplace Recording Considerations
Workplace recordings have additional considerations beyond state consent laws. The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects employees who record to document potential labor law violations, even in two-party consent states.
The 2023 Starbucks decision clarified that employers may face liability under the NLRA for terminating employees who make secret recordings to preserve evidence of labor law violations - even if those recordings violate state law.
β οΈ Important: Important: Many employers have internal policies prohibiting recording. Even if legal under state law, violating company policy can result in termination. Always check your employee handbook.
β Best Practices for Legal Recording
1. Always Notify Participants
Regardless of your state laws, inform all participants before recording begins. This builds trust and ensures compliance with the strictest standards.
2. Get Written Consent When Possible
Include recording consent in meeting invitations or use tools that require acknowledgment before joining recorded meetings.
3. Verbal Consent on Record
At the start of recordings, state that the meeting is being recorded and ask participants to confirm they consent.
4. Use Compliant Tools
Choose AI meeting tools that provide automatic notifications, consent tracking, and compliance documentation.
5. Document Everything
Keep records of consent for each recorded meeting in case questions arise later.
6. Know Participant Locations
For remote meetings, identify where participants are located to determine which consent laws apply.
β οΈ Penalties for Illegal Recording
Recording without proper consent can result in serious consequences:
- β’Criminal charges (felony in some states)
- β’Civil lawsuits and monetary damages
- β’Recordings excluded as evidence in court
- β’Employment termination
- β’Professional license consequences
π¨ Warning: In California, for example, illegal recording is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine up to $2,500 and up to one year in jail for first offenses.
π€ How AI Meeting Tools Handle Consent
Modern AI meeting assistants include features to help with consent compliance:
- βAutomatic recording notifications displayed to all participants
- βConsent acknowledgment prompts before recording starts
- βRecording indicators visible throughout the meeting
- βAudit trails showing who was notified and when
- βOptions to disable recording for specific meetings or participants
Most AI transcription tools like Otter.ai, Fireflies, tl;dv, and Fathom display clear recording indicators, but always verify your specific tool meets your jurisdiction requirements.
π International Recording Laws
For meetings with international participants, additional regulations apply:
πͺπΊ EU/GDPR
GDPR (European Union): Requires explicit consent for recording and strict data handling requirements.
π¬π§ UK
UK: Similar to GDPR post-Brexit, with consent requirements under UK data protection laws.
π¨π¦ Canada
Canada: PIPEDA requires consent, but one-party consent generally applies to private recordings.
π‘ For international meetings, default to obtaining explicit consent from all parties and ensure your recording tool complies with relevant data protection regulations.